ENGLISH ITERATURE ESSAY Chloe Reynolds ?The Handmaids Tale written by Marg argont Atwood is an extreme dystopic tidy sum of the oppressiveness of women, their rights and libber values. Atwood describes a theocracy in which women are ? walk wombs figure for reproduction entirely. In Gilead, the arbitrary in which the taradiddle is educate, women are denied their identities and their witness personal exemption. To over pay back this de graciousisation, the feminist icons in the paper such(prenominal) as Offred, the lead character, re come apart to reminiscing just ab emerge the outgoings as an escape passage from this totalitarian regime. Atwood heightens the dystopic effects of her novel through every(prenominal)usion. Allusion legitimises the worst aspects of this bon ton using the Rachel and Bilhah story from Genesis 30 that ultimately perverts the full-strength intent of Rachels actions. In this story, Rachel uses Bilhah, her maid, as a surrogate find because s he is unable to produce children for her husband Jacob and, hence, uses a handmaiden. The ironic issue is that every(prenominal) biblical allusions are selected in instal to incubate spewriarchal interest. Irony is a rattling important putz is Atwoods commentary. The way the government have act to create a utopia has, in-turn, created a dystopia. The vision of an ideal or model valet shrouded in harmony has been clouded by an unrealistic, out of the uncertainty world that could only be called a Dystopia. Women are the nitty-gritty of this dystopia, without them the Gileadian ordination would be non existent, even women are hardened as institutionalised sex victims with no freedom to shoot their own hunchrs or even keep the children they bear. Children beared by the handmaids go serial to the commanders wives as if they are naught more than a moving in transaction, even prizes, The commanders wife looks down at the fuck up as if it is a bouquet of flowers, what soeverthing shes won, a tribute. P136 The! society of Gilead and the fictitious character of the handmaid is base around sex and pregnancy as social obligations, non personal prizes. Women are still treat as objects, degraded, controlled and undermined by a distorted theocracy. We are two-legged wombs, thats all: sanctified vessels, ambulatory chalices. P146 Offred refuses to lose her perspective and continually reminisces about her pat to help wield her sanity. This is the ?reconstruction technique that Atwood uses in her commentary. It humanises Offred, reservation her out as if she does actually have thoughts, feelings and memories, she has not even so been broken by society. Offred does not devotely disagree with what is exit on around her, she discreetly sits on the fence and does what is necessary, quicken fastener more, nothing less. I motivation everything back, the way it was. entirely in that location is no speckle to is, this wanting. P132 Offred accepts the fact hat there is nothing she can do to change the accompaniment that she is in so she lives with it. Moira, on the new(prenominal) hand, is the complete opposite. She is Offreds top hat friend and a pillar of feminism. Moira had a bad constitution with the aunts because she still had a taste for freedom and doesnt hesitate to catch other(a) handmaids. She was openly rebellious, a ? lively(a) woman and this bestowed power on her. Moira had power now, shed been set loose, shed set herself loose. She was now a loose woman. I think we found this frightening. Moira was like an elevator with open sides. She do us dizzy¦ Moira was our fantasy¦ In the light of Moira, the aunts were less dreadful and more absurd. P143 Moira was like a goddess to the other handmaids, someone they could adhere to, someone they could rely on. Contrarily, Janine was on the other side of the deference scale. She had entirely lost her identity and is referred to as a puppy that had been kicked too often, by too umpteen peop le. P139 She is a fatigued and pitiful character w! ho cannot be trusted. Where Moira is unwavering and genuine, Janine is snivelling and transparent. She will do anything for a moment of approbation. These three rally characters, Offred, Moira and Janine show how diametrical women conformed to the regime that they had to succumb to. Offred reminisces about her past for comfort and to maintain her sanity. Moira unguardedly demonstrates her disrespect for authority and inturn makes herself a role model. Lastly, Janine willingly kisses the feet of her get the hang and does what shes told without interrogation. These women were denied the right to question the authorities and their intentions. Women were bound to ?conjugal obligations collect to the patriarchal values and beliefs that were central to regime.
Gilead actually did do some amiable things for women in society despite the negative aspects that were loosely prevalent. Females had reclaimed the night - it was beneficial for them to walk the streets. They were given freedom from obscenities; however, this seems ironic considering the ceremonies the handmaids had to undergo. Handmaids are all equal and vital to the result and survival of Gilead; they became revered. With some of these compulsory aspects there were also negative, yet it makes it difficult to decided from an outsiders point of view whether they were better off. in that respect was barely any crime, no documented poverty and no competition amid women for love, marriage. However, there is no love, no choice and no freedom. These things are human nature and to take them external from not only women but also men for the propose of winning a war seems incredibly inhumane. The authorities of Gilead completely ruled out love as natures norm ! and considered it something pushed by the magazines of Pre-Gilead. Generally, a theocracy is a government that bases their political laws on a faith. Gileads laws are based on Christianity but they twisted the religious belief around so much that that it is almost used as a scapegoat. The heaviness of women and dystopic vision of their rights and values at the ?hands of a distorted religion makes our 20th century minds cringe at the freedom and choice that they were denied. In the present, issues such as sex, love, marriage, childbirth are taken so much fro granted that it is unimaginable how people such as ourselves would react in this sort of situation. Gileadian authorities were seek to build up a society that was unbreakable by arranging loveless marriages and shredding deformed babies, not to mention infinite other things. In the process they denied human spirit, human love and human emotion. They tore down feminist values and rights and made women susceptible to instit utionalised rape for reproduction. patriarchic values and beliefs were throw out of proportion making it a mans world, fulfilling men, demoralising women. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderEssay.netIf you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page:
write my essay
