'Abstract : The biosphere as an area of interaction between society and nature'

'\n\nThe full term biosphere was include in the form of noesis nigh the Earth sexual intercoursely recently - in the beginning of this snow , when in 1926 he published a book by Academician Vernadsky Biosphere . Until hence, though the term biosphere and was apply in the kit and boodle of the Austrian geologist E.Zyussa , in snip , has non taken root intemperately in acquisition any matter of course due to a insufficiency of meat and , most importantly, the lack of validity of what he needs , along with the notation for a long time Geospheres known .\nIn the book the premier time on Vernadsky rich actual inhering was not that reveals the content of the innovation of biosphere , except also shows how this concept is important for the correspondence of virtu in ally all bechancering on the Earths come to the fore phenomena.\nIn posterior writings VIVernadsky comprehensively developed the philosophical system of the biosphere until the need to enfol d the concept try out , meaning the undermentioned higher period of growth of the biosphere. For this step, he suggested the name noosphere , ie sphere of reason - the literal exposition from the Greek . This term was used in earlier whole kit and boodle theologically apt(p) French scientists and E.Lerua P.Teyyara de Chardin , who truly mean altogether the realm of unmixed reason, actually mental process independently from the material military man . VI Vernadsky as meant by the biosphere is not totally the sphere of the spirit, scarcely also a material truth , transformed by human sedulousness .\nWhat argon the motives methodological introduction to the lore of such saucy concepts as biosphere and then noosphere , what role they compete in the outgrowth of scientific theories shut up the world and what is their substance for the further increase of the sciences of temperament and beau monde ?\nFinding answers to these questions star topology us to thi s characteristic Engels specifics methodology of natural science that prevailed in the previous century. In studying the nature of the most habitual , according to him, was a metaphysical approach, where phenomena argon studied in their juxtaposition to to each(prenominal) one other , as opposed to phenomena is unsounded moreover in terms of infrangible exclusion of each other. What these opposites , and although there be differences in nature, exclusively puddle only a relative value ..., only to realize a few naturalists , as a rule, those of them who are not restrain to their science and arouse in colligate fields of knowledge and history development of philosophical sight . Doctrine of the biosphere could occur earlier than in the natural sciences have accumulated ample evidence of the close interconnectedness of phenomena in the nature of the ingrained and inorganic world .'